CG GDAO
  • DAO Overview
    • Introduction
    • Governance Resources
    • Voting and Proposals
    • DAO Councils and Treasury
  • Governance Process
    • Proposals
      • Proposal Process
      • Proposal Tags
      • Proposal Templates
    • Voting
      • Voting Process
      • Elections
    • Participation vs Apathy
  • Council & Treasury Frameworks
    • Overview
    • Councils
      • CGDAO Committee
      • CGDAO Guardian Board
      • Nested Multi-Sig Diagram
    • Treasury
      • Responsibilities
      • Funding
  • Education
    • Governance Voting Guide
    • Snapshot Voting Guide
    • Governance Proposal Guide
    • FAQ
    • Terms
  • Guardian Improvement Proposals
    • Readme
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Encouraging Participation
  • Avoiding Voter Apathy

Was this helpful?

  1. Governance Process

Participation vs Apathy

Encouraging Participation

  • Implementing two tiers of votes

    • Proposals with low impact only require 1000 VP to vote.

    • Proposals with high impact affecting protocols/governance/treasury will require 10,000 VP to vote.

  • Using Elections

    • Electing community members to show commitment towards more decentralization.

  • Incentivize voting

    • “I Voted Poaps”

    • Possible Guardian NFT

Avoiding Voter Apathy

  • Creating template and time requirements for proposals

    • Templates make it easy for users to progress through research and get to voting efficiently

    • Time requirements allow good proposals to filter to the top after peer review.

  • Direct proposal flows through forum admins.

    • This filters useless and junk proposals which can dilute and bore users.

  • Present tools for ease of use voting, data tracking, and provide governance education.

PreviousElectionsNextOverview

Last updated 2 years ago

Was this helpful?